board-research.markdown

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 ***
 
-![](https://es.technikum-wien.at/iplat/testwiki/raw/master/home/Logos.png)
+![](./home/Logos.png)
 
 ***
 
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ We then created an overview over the available FPGAs/SoCs and specifically the a
 
 A wide range of SoC boards are offered on the market, and several of them were qualified. Figure 1 displays the qualified SoC development boards, ranked by the evaluation result.
 
-![ranking SoC](https://es.technikum-wien.at/iplat/testwiki/raw/master/board-research/SoC_ranking.png)
+![ranking SoC](./board-research/SoC_ranking.png)
 
 *Figure 1 - Ranking of qualified SoC development boards*
 
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ In order to evaluate the toolchains of both manufacturers, two boards were selec
 
 For the FPGA board, there was less choice which met our requirements. Figure 2 displays the qualified FPGA development boards, ranked by the evaluation result.
 
-![ranking FPGA](https://es.technikum-wien.at/iplat/testwiki/raw/master/board-research/FPGA_ranking.png)
+![ranking FPGA](./board-research/FPGA_ranking.png)
 
 *Figure 2 - Ranking of qualified FPGA development boards*